arrow-circle arrow-down-basicarrow-down arrow-left-small arrow-left arrow-right-small arrow-right arrow-up arrow closefacebooklinkedinsearch twittervideo-icon

North America Regional Hub: Canada Webinar Series — Youth Engagement Strategies for Municipalities

— 9 minutes reading time

This report provides a summary of discussions during the webinar and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Strong Cities Network Management Unit, Strong Cities members, event sponsors or participants.

On 15 July 2026, the Strong Cities Network North America Regional Hub hosted the sixth instalment of its Canada Webinar Series. The session explored how municipalities can engage young people as partners in addressing local issues and equip them with the skills to participate meaningfully in prevention efforts. Representatives from CIVIX and the Students Commission of Canada outlined free programming that builds digital media literacy, constructive discussion skills and local problem-solving among students. They also explored how municipalities can facilitate the delivery of these programmes in collaboration with schools, community organisations and young people.

Speakers

Ken Boyd, Director of Education at CIVIX, introduced the organisation as a civic education charity focused on helping Canadians develop the knowledge and skills needed for democratic participation. CIVIX designs free programmes in English and French and trains educators and facilitators to deliver them. Boyd contrasted this experiential approach with traditional civics teaching rooted in memorisation, arguing that students learn democratic participation best by practising it.

Kelsey Davis, Digital Literacy Project Manager at CIVIX, highlighted programmes with particular relevance for municipalities. CTRL-F builds digital media literacy, including critical navigation of disinformation and AI-generated content. PoliTalks helps students discuss political and social issues constructively and gives educators tools to facilitate constructive discussion rather than debate. Davis noted that young people are increasingly exposed to political and social issues through social media and at home, but often lack structured opportunities to discuss them constructively.

Davis added that these skills are needed beyond classrooms. CIVIX offers Find the Facts, a self-paced micro-credential on evaluating online sources and claims, as well as a ready-made slide deck and workshop guide for libraries and community organisations. Its Better Discussions handbook adapts lessons from PoliTalks for civil society leaders, elected officials and others seeking to create discussion-friendly environments and manage difficult conversations.

Davis also described Student Vote, CIVIX’s flagship programme, which runs parallel elections for students alongside municipal, provincial, territorial and federal votes. Students learn about the electoral process, research candidates in their own district and cast ballots, with the results published afterwards. Rep Day brings federal representatives into schools for structured dialogue, helping students understand democratic institutions and voice concerns directly. Davis encouraged municipalities to build relationships with local schools, noting that students “have incredible insights, and they want to be heard”.

Boyd then introduced Civic Action, a classroom programme in which students identify a local issue, plan a response and carry it out. Microgrants will be available in autumn 2026 for school groups needing support to implement projects, and the programme is open to young people in municipalities across Canada.

The pilot’s central lesson was that young people take action when they feel agency. As Boyd put it, “There is no shortage of good ideas from young people about what they can do to improve their communities”. What is often missing is clarity on where to go for help. Municipalities can provide plain-language guidance on which level of government is responsible for different issues and how young residents can make contact.

Boyd closed by noting that action civics appears unevenly across Canadian curricula. Municipalities can therefore encourage school boards and teachers to use free programming where available and can work with young people inside and outside schools to identify local issues. Young residents can also surface problems officials may have missed and help draw attention to existing municipal priorities.

Christa Romaldi, Chief Development Officer at the Students Commission of Canada, described youth engagement “as the sustained and meaningful involvement of a young person in an activity beyond the self”. She introduced Hearing Unheard Moments, a project focused on preventing polarisation and grievance-based violence, as an example of engagement that builds belonging. Belonging, she argued, underpins violence prevention, mental health and wellness and civic participation.

Romaldi identified two foundations of the organisation’s approach: intergenerational co-creation and four simple pillars: Respect, Listen, Understand and Communicate. The Students Commission emphasises youth engagement alongside trained adult allies, rather than youth-led activity alone, so that young people are supported before, during and after participation.

The Students Commission focuses heavily on third spaces such as libraries, community centres, youth organisations, skate parks and playing fields. It works in places young people already occupy and co-creates what it calls safer spaces, recognising that no space is equally safe for everyone. Romaldi described this as an ongoing practice of listening and adaptation. Adult allies need training to support young people through the risks of participation and to act on what they share. The organisation’s tools include a social identity formation model and a process for grounding youth voice in evidence: study an issue, discuss how it appears in young people’s lived experiences, prioritise what to address and generate action plans or recommendations.

Romaldi’s principal municipal example was Prince Edward County, a rural county in Ontario that faces a shortage of resources for residents, particularly young people. In 2017, the county launched a collective impact project examining how it could become a better place for young people to grow up. The Students Commission partnered with the county, initially gathering young people’s perspectives through surveys, focus groups and local and regional events to understand what they wanted and felt was missing. It then worked with them to set objectives. It also helped establish a youth leadership team operating in parallel with the adult leadership team of the wider collective, with the Students Commission acting as a bridge between the two.

The county has since introduced public transit for the first time and made it free for young people, and it is now working with the municipality on a youth safety strategy. Over the past year the Students Commission has delivered training on youth safety, wellbeing and belonging to municipal staff, local employers and local leaders.

Romaldi highlighted three conditions for sustained youth engagement: time, recognition of the value of youth voice and consistency. Integrating young people into municipal systems requires adults and officials to learn and practise engagement. Partners may also need to see the value of youth voice demonstrated through the work itself. Finally, initiatives are more likely to survive funding fluctuations when municipalities continue to prioritise them.

She closed by pointing to Hearing Unheard Moments resources developed with national partners, including CIVIX. The project emphasises that everyone has value, curiosity can be practised, inclusion requires learnable skills and diversity strengthens difficult discussions. Its materials cover violence prevention, digital and media literacy, and support for adults working with young people, including educators, youth workers and public health staff.

Asked whether the Students Commission’s approach changes with the size of the municipality, Romaldi said smaller communities can be easier to engage because relationships are often closer, while larger cities may involve more actors and coordination. The core content remains similar; what changes is the time needed to build networks and agree how partners will work together.

Responding to a policy coordinator from the Region of Durham who was preparing youth focus groups for an anti-hate initiative, Romaldi recommended a laddered approach to vulnerability. Anonymous methods should come first, followed by low-risk games and movement-based activities that gradually allow more personal sharing. Physical set-up matters: when participants move around the room rather than sit face to face, discussion can feel less confrontational and reveal nuance a conventional focus group might miss.

A final question concerned recruitment and retention. Boyd said schools help CIVIX reach young people and that microgrants can provide an incentive, but attention is often more powerful than rewards. Young people are more likely to remain engaged when their concerns reach decision-makers who are able to act on them. Romaldi added that relationships with peers and supportive adults keep young people involved, and that framing affects who comes forward: a youth advisory committee may attract those who already see themselves as leaders, while a youth group can bring in a wider mix. Where municipalities lack direct relationships, she advised working through trusted community partners. Strong Cities closed by thanking both organisations and encouraging attendees to make use of their resources, noting that all the material discussed is free and available online.

The Canada Webinar Series will continue in Autumn with new practical sessions for the Canadian municipalities. If you would like to suggest a topic, please contact [email protected].

For more information on this event or Strong Cities North America programming, please contact the North America Regional Hub at [email protected].